Just v. Land Reclamation, Ltd.
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of Omaha (Wash. 1995)
- Dimmitt Chevrolet v. Southeastern Fidelity (Fla. 1994)
- Seitzinger v. Community Health Network (Wis. 2004)
- Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Admiral Insurance Co. (Okla. 1995)
- Paul Patz v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (7th Cir. 1994)
- Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of America (Minn. 1994)
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. (Colo. 1991)
- Western Surety Co. v. Alliance Steel Construction, Inc. (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 2007)
- NATIONAL-BEN FRANKLIN INS. CO., ILL. v. Levernier (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2003)
- National-Ben Franklin Insurance v. Levernier (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2003)
- Morrow Corp. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2000)
- Guenther v. City of Onalaska (Wis. Ct. App. 1998)
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1995)
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, Incorporated (7th Cir. 1994)
- Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (District Court, District of Columbia 1994)
- Curran Composites, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1994)
- Trico Industries, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (United States District Court for the Central District of California 1994)
- Carney v. White (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1994)
- AY McDonald Industries v. INA (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1993)
- A.Y. Mcdonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1993)
- United States Fire Insurance v. Ace Baking Co. (Wis. Ct. App. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Motion for Reconsideration denied without costs.
Notwithstanding this denial, the following changes have been made to 155 Wis. 2d 737, 760, 456 N.W.2d 570, 579 (1990).
Strike the words "the insurance carriers have a duty to defend" and insert a lower case "s" in the word summary. The second to last sentence of the opinion will then read as follows: "Because the exclusionary clause does not preclude coverage, and the allegations in the complaint together with the depositions, interrogatories and affidavits raise inferences that could support a recovery covered by the policy, summary judgment should not have been granted."
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.