In re the Creation of the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee
In re the Creation of the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On October 13,1992 the court held a public hearing on the petition of the Honorable Susan Steingass, chairperson of the Wisconsin Equal Justice Task Force, and others seeking the creation of a supreme court committee "charged with implementing, monitoring, evaluating and reporting to the court on efforts to eliminate gender-related problems in the delivery of legal services and opportunities for fair and accessible treatment for all persons." That hearing was also held on the related petitions of the Governor's Advisory Council on Domestic Abuse and Madison Men's Organization. The court has considered the presentations at that hearing and the written material filed in the matter.
It Is Ordered that there is created the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee, charged with assisting the Wisconsin court system, within the bounds of the Supreme Court's administrative and superintending authority, to eliminate bias on the basis of gender and to achieve and promote gender neutrality in the court system. Using as a starting point some of the recommendations of the Equal Jus
It Is Further Ordered that the following persons are appointed to serve on the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee:
Honorable Thomas Cane — Wausau
Honorable Patricia S. Curley — Milwaukee
Honorable John B. Kerski — Marinette
Attorney Maureen L. Kinney — LaCrosse
Honorable Barbara A. Kluka Attorney Michael P. Lehner — Kenosha — Princeton
Attorney Linda Swagger Maris — Milwaukee
Gail Richardson, District Court Administrator — Madison
Honorable Earl W. Schmidt — Shawano
Honorable Judith M. Stem, Family Court Commissioner — Elkhom
Honorable Maxine A. White — Milwaukee
It Is Further Ordered that the chair of the Committee shall be selected by its members and the organizational meeting of the Committee shall be called by the Chief Justice.
It Is Further Ordered that the director of state courts shall arrange for the necessary staffing to the Committee.
It Is Further Ordered that the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee shall file with the court an
Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, this 8th day of June, 1993.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Marilyn L. Graves
Marilyn L. Graves, Clerk
Concurring Opinion
{concurring). I strongly support the Court's decision to create the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee. The committee's mandate ensures a flexibility that can only enhance the quality of the committee's work.
I would prefer, however, that the committee membership were expanded. While it is certainly beneficial to include, as we have done, wide representation from within the judicial system, I believe that the perspective of people outside the court family is also important. As we have done on other committees and as several other states have done in their gender equality implementation committees, I would directly involve the public, so that the people the legal system is designed to serve are at the table. I would also have placed on this committee people from business and the executive and legislative branches of government who have worked with the issue of gender bias and could have lent their expertise.
In short, although I would have proceeded a bit differently, I join the court in undertaking this endeavor.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of the Creation of the Supreme Court Gender Equality Committee
- Status
- Published