Wenke v. Gehl Co.
Wenke v. Gehl Co.
Opinion
¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court. Justice N. Patrick Crooks, Justice David T. Prosser, Jr., and Justice Diane S. Sykes would affirm. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice William A. Bablitch, and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley would reverse. Justice Jon P Wilcox did not participate.
¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, *677 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule but declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue).
¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.
By the Court. — The Order granting certification is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Martin G. Wenke and Dakota M. Wenke, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Lynn R. Laufenberg, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gehl Company, a Wisconsin Corporation, Defendant-Respondent
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published