DaimlerCHRYSLER C/O ESIS v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mauricio Aguilar v. Husco International, Inc. (Wis. 2015)
- State v. Samuel Curtis Johnson, III (Wis. 2014)
- State v. Andrew J. Matasek (Wis. 2014)
- Szalacinski v. Campbell (Wis. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
¶ 1. DaimlerChrysler moves the court to reconsider its opinion in DaimlerChrysler v. Labor & Industry Review Comm'n, 2007 WI 15, 299 Wis. 2d 1, 727 N.W.2d 311, on the ground that the court based its decision on a statute not in effect when the injury to Glenn May occurred.
¶ 2. The motion for reconsideration is denied.
¶ 3. However, to clarify the DaimlerChrysler opinion, we now add the following footnote at the end of the second sentence of ¶ 39:
17 Wisconsin Stat. § 102.32(6)(b) became effective March 30, 2004. Wis. Act 144. It was therefore not in effect at the time of May's accident. We draw on it here not as a statement of the law in 1999, but because it demonstrates that the LIRC's interpretation of § 102.18(l)(d) is reasonable.
¶ 4. Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is denied, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.