Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ray

Wisconsin Supreme Court March 16, 2011

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ray, 332 Wis. 2d 274 (Wis. 2011)

2011 WI 17; 797 N.W.2d 788; 2011 Wisc. LEXIS 151

Crooks

Opinion of the Court

*276The referee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation are approved and adopted. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the file be placed under seal because it contains confidential information; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the day of this order, Virginia Rose Ray pay to the Office of Lawyer Regulation the costs of this proceeding, which total $30,354.68 as of January 3, 2011.

Concurring Opinion

Crooks, J.,

concurs in the denial of the petition for reinstatement and dissents from the portion of the order placing the file under seal.

Reference

Full Case Name: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Virginia Rose Ray, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation f/k/a Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Virginia Rose Ray
Status: Published