Jama I. Jama v. Jason C. Gonzalez

Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jama I. Jama v. Jason C. Gonzalez, 2021 WI 79 (Wis. 2021)

Jama I. Jama v. Jason C. Gonzalez

Opinion

2021 WI 79

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP629

COMPLETE TITLE: Jama I. Jama, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jason C. Gonzalez and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners.

REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at 395 Wis. 2d 655,954 N.W.2d 1 PDC No:2021 WI App 3 - Published

OPINION FILED: October 20, 2021 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: October 1, 2021

SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: Valerie Bailey-Rihn

JUSTICES: Per Curiam. NOT PARTICIPATING: KAROFSKY, J., did not participate.

ATTORNEYS:

For the defendants-respondents-petitioners, there were briefs filed by Peyton B. Engel, Catherine E. White, Stephen P. Hurley, and Hurley Burish, S.C., Madison. There was an oral argument by Peyton B. Engel.

For the plaintiff-appellant, there was a brief filed by Kevin G. Raasch, David J. Lang, and Judge Lang & Katers, LLC, Wauwatosa. There was an oral argument by Kevin G. Raasch. 2021 WI 79

NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2019AP629 (L.C. No. 2018CV1478)

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

Jama I. Jama,

Plaintiff-Appellant, FILED v. OCT 20, 2021 Jason C. Gonzalez and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court

Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.

¶1 PER CURIAM. The decision of the court of appeals is

affirmed by an equally divided court.

¶2 JILL J. KAROFKSY, J., did not participate. No. 2019AP629

1

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published