Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2021

Jama I. Jama v. Jason C. Gonzalez

Jama I. Jama v. Jason C. Gonzalez
Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided October 20, 2021
2021 WI 79

Jama I. Jama v. Jason C. Gonzalez

Opinion

2021 WI 79 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP629

COMPLETE TITLE: Jama I. Jama, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jason C. Gonzalez and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners.

REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at 395 Wis. 2d 655,954 N.W.2d 1 PDC No:2021 WI App 3 - Published OPINION FILED: October 20, 2021 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: October 1, 2021 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: Valerie Bailey-Rihn JUSTICES: Per Curiam.

NOT PARTICIPATING: KAROFSKY, J., did not participate.

ATTORNEYS: For the defendants-respondents-petitioners, there were briefs filed by Peyton B. Engel, Catherine E. White, Stephen P. Hurley, and Hurley Burish, S.C., Madison. There was an oral argument by Peyton B. Engel.

For the plaintiff-appellant, there was a brief filed by Kevin G. Raasch, David J. Lang, and Judge Lang & Katers, LLC, Wauwatosa.

There was an oral argument by Kevin G. Raasch. 2021 WI 79

NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.

No. 2019AP629 (L.C. No. 2018CV1478) STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT Jama I. Jama, Plaintiff-Appellant, FILED v. OCT 20, 2021 Jason C. Gonzalez and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.

¶1 PER CURIAM. The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.

¶2 JILL J. KAROFKSY, J., did not participate.

No. 2019AP629

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.