2023 WI 62

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2023AP1144-D

COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Medical Incapacity Proceedings Against Jeffrey L. Murrell., Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Jeffrey L. Murrell, Respondent.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MURRELL

OPINION FILED: August 23, 2023 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT:

SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE:

JUSTICES: Per curiam.

ATTORNEYS: 2023 WI 62 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2023AP1144-D

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

In the Matter of Medical Incapacity Proceedings Against Jeffrey L. Murrell, Attorney at Law:

FILED Office of Lawyer Regulation, AUG 23, 2023 Complainant, Samuel A. Christensen v. Clerk of Supreme Court

Jeffrey L. Murrell,

Respondent.

The Court entered the following order on this date:

¶1 Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell was admitted to practice

law in Wisconsin in 1995 and practices in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

¶2 On June 29, 2023, the Office of Lawyer Regulation

(OLR) filed a petition, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR)

22.34, requesting that Attorney Murrell be found to have a

medical incapacity and that the court impose conditions on

Attorney Murrell's continued practice of law in Wisconsin. See

SCR 22.34. No. 2023AP1144-D

¶3 The petition was accompanied by a stipulation executed

by OLR and Attorney Murrell. In the stipulation, Attorney

Murrell acknowledges that he suffers from a medical incapacity

that at times substantially prevents him from performing the

duties of an attorney to acceptable professional standards.

Attorney Murrell admits that each of the factual allegations in

OLR's petition is true and accurate.

¶4 The parties jointly recommend that conditions be

imposed on Attorney Murrell's practice of law, requiring him to:

a. Enter into a contract with the Wisconsin Lawyer Assistance Program (WisLAP) to participate in its monitoring program for a period of three years;

b. Obtain follow-up care with his mental health providers as recommended by WisLAP;

c. Immediately self-report to OLR any police contact, arrests, or criminal charges; and

d. Arrange repayment of the $6,500 that the Wisconsin Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection paid to M.K. to reimburse her for the advance fee that she paid to Attorney Murrell to represent her son. ¶5 In the stipulation, Attorney Murrell represents and verifies that he fully understands his right to contest OLR's

allegations of medical incapacity, to see and cross-examine

witnesses called by OLR, to call witnesses and present testimony

and evidence on his own behalf, to require OLR to prove its

allegations by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence, and

to make arguments to the referee that OLR has failed to meet its

burden of proof. Attorney Murrell further avers that he understands the ramifications of his entry into the stipulation;

2 No. 2023AP1144-D

that he has the right to consult counsel; and that his entry

into the stipulation is made knowingly and voluntarily. The

parties also state that the stipulation is not the result of a

plea bargain, but instead represents Attorney Murrell's

admission of a medical incapacity that substantially prevents

him from performing the duties of an attorney to acceptable

professional standards and his agreement to the conditions on

his practice of law recommended by OLR.

¶6 The stipulation further provides that, in the event

OLR determines that Attorney Murrell has failed to comply with

the WisLAP monitoring condition, OLR may petition this court for

a summary and immediate suspension of Attorney Murrell's license

to practice law pending any further investigation or proceedings

that may be necessary under the circumstances, and if OLR

determines that Attorney Murrell has failed to comply with the

other conditions set forth above, OLR may seek the issuance of

an order to show cause why Attorney Murrell's license to

practice law should not be summarily suspended.

3 No. 2023AP1144-D

¶7 Based on the parties' stipulation, which this court

approves and adopts pursuant to SCR 22.34(10),1 the court finds

that Attorney Murrell currently suffers from a medical

incapacity that at times substantially prevents him from

performing the duties of an attorney to acceptable professional

standards.

¶8 IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted.

¶9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following conditions

shall be imposed on Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell's practice of

law:

a. Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell shall enter into a contract with WisLAP to participate in its monitoring program for a period of three years;

b. Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell shall obtain follow-up care with his mental health providers as recommended by WisLAP;

SCR 22.34 (10) provides: "The petition may be accompanied 1

by a stipulation of the director and the respondent to a suspension or to the imposition of conditions on the respondent's practice of law. The supreme court may consider the petition and stipulation without the appointment of a referee. If the supreme court rejects the stipulation, it shall issue an order consistent with the stipulation. If the supreme court rejects the stipulation, an available referee shall be selected from the panel provided in SCR 21.08, based on the location of the respondent's place of residence. The chief justice or, in his or her absence, the chief justice's delegee shall issue an order appointing the referee, and the matter shall proceed as a petition filed without a stipulation. A stipulation rejected by the supreme court has no evidentiary value and is without prejudice to the respondent's defense of the proceeding or the prosecution of the petition."

4 No. 2023AP1144-D

c. Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell shall immediately self- report to OLR any police contact, arrests, or criminal charges; and

d. Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell shall arrange repayment of the $6,500 that the Wisconsin Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection paid to M.K. to reimburse her for the advance fee that she paid to Attorney Murrell to represent her son. ¶10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event OLR determines

that Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell has failed to comply with the

WisLAP monitoring condition, OLR may petition this court for a

summary and immediate suspension of Attorney Jeffrey Lee

Murrell's license to practice law pending any further

investigation or proceedings that may be necessary under the

circumstances, and if OLR determines that Attorney Jeffrey Lee

Murrell has failed to comply with the other conditions set forth

above, OLR may seek the issuance of an order to show cause why

Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell's license to practice law should

not be summarily suspended.

¶11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no costs shall be imposed

on Attorney Jeffrey Lee Murrell relating to this medical

incapacity proceeding.

5 No. 2023AP1144-D

1