2023 WI 68

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP311-CR

COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Donte Quintell McBride, Defendant-Appellant.

REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at 405 Wis. 2d 771,985 N.W.2d 452 (2023 – unpublished)

OPINION FILED: October 10, 2023 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: September 15, 2023

SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Milwaukee JUDGE: Jonathan D. Watts

JUSTICES: Per Curiam. NOT PARTICIPATING: Janet C. Protasiewicz, J.

ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant, there was a brief filed by Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument by Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender. 2023 WI 68 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2021AP311-CR (L.C. No. 2018CF5172)

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

State of Wisconsin,

Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, FILED v. OCT 10, 2023

Donte Quintell McBride, Samuel A. Christensen Clerk of Supreme Court

Defendant-Appellant.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.

¶1 PER CURIAM. The decision of the court of appeals is

affirmed by an equally divided court.

¶2 JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did not participate. No. 2021AP311-CR

1