Hendricks v. State Road Commission
Opinion of the Court
This claim arose from damage caused to the roof of the dwelling house of the Claimants situate near the Right of Way
The evidence taken clearly disclosed that the undermining of the roots of the trees during the construction work of Interstate 64 in that area caused the trees to die, and become a hazard to adjoining property. A maintenance employee of the Respondent admitted that during his patrol of the Road he observed the dead trees, but since no complaints had been received no effort was made to remove them. He further admitted that he did not know how bad their condition was, but the trees were promptly removed ’after the accident. The failure of the Claimants to report the dangerous condition of the trees does not bar them from recovery when the condition is obvious from a routine patrolling of the road to the maintenance employees of the Respondent who are charged with the responsibility of removing hazards from the right of way.
It is the finding of the Court that the Respondent’s employees failed to exercise ordinary care under the circumstances, 'and that their negligence was the proximate cause of the damage. The falling of a tree or trees on the dwelling house five feet away during a rainstorm or high wind was a foreseeable consequence, and we therefore hold the Respondent liable for the damages caused to the dwelling house, there being nothing in the record before us to indicate that the Claimants were guilty of any contributory negligence.
Claim allowed in the amount of $498.00.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.