Lipscomb v. Department of Highways
Opinion of the Court
Claimant, Gregory K. Lipscomb, filed this claim against the Department of Highways in the amount of $200.00 for damages to his 1974 Alfa Romeo Veloce automobile sustained on Feb
Claimant testified that he drove this road two to four times a day and that he had noticed ice on the road before, but not to the extent found at the accident. He further stated that on the night of the accident, there was ice and snow along the highway, but none on the roadway, except at the accident scene. No evidence was introduced to prove knowledge, either actual or constructive, that respondent was aware of the ice on the highway. The law is well established in West Virginia that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of persons traveling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E. 2d 81 (1947); Jeter v. Dept. of Highways, 11 Ct. Cl. 154 (1976). Before the respondent can be held liable, there must be some showing that the respondent knew or should have known of the existence of ice on the highway. See Keith v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct. Cl. 199 (1978). Accordingly, the Court disallows this claim.
Claim disallowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.