Gold v. Public Legal Services
Opinion of the Court
The claimants are attorneys who served as counsel for criminal indigents in juvenile, misdemeanor, or felony proceedings pursuant to the provisions of West Virginia Code, Chapter 51, Article 11. Claimants’ fees were denied by the respondent because the fund was exhausted.
The claimants also served as counsel for indigents in Mental
The factual situations in this claim are identical to that in Richard K. Swartling, et al. v. Office of the State Auditor, 13 Ct.Cl. 57 (1979). Accordingly, awards are made in the amounts indicated below to the claimants.
Needy Persons Fund — award of $422.50.
Mental Hygiene Fund — award of $65.00.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.