Calise v. Department of Highways
Opinion of the Court
Claimant is a bicycle enthusiast and claims $3,000 for bicycle damage
In the presentation of his case, it was intimated, but not proven, that the sewer grating was incorrectly installed; that it should have been installed with the grate openings perpendicular to the edge of the highway.
The Court has consistently held that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of persons travelling on its highways. Adkins vs. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645 (1947). The Court perceives no negligence on the part of the respondent in this case, and the claim must be denied.
Claim disallowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.