Craddock v. Department of Highways
Opinion of the Court
Charles Shaver, construction engineer for respondent on the project, testified for respondent. Mr. Shaver stated that an independent contractor, Barboursville Bridge Company, was responsible for the work on the project. The only employees of the respondent at the site were a supervisor and an inspector.
The record in this case does not establish any negligence on the part of the respondent. Barboursville Bridge Company was an independent contractor. This Court has previously held that the respondent cannot be held liable for the negligence, if any, of an independent contractor. Paul v. Dept. of Highways 14 Ct.Cl. 479 (1983); Harper v. Dept. of Highways 13 Ct.Cl. 274 (1980); Safeco Insurance Co. v. Dept. of Highways 9 Ct.Cl. 28 (1971). Accordingly, this claim must be disallowed.
Claim disallowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.