Burdette v. Division of Highways
Opinion of the Court
The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists traveling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). However, the respondent has a duty to use reasonable care in its maintenance of the streets and bridges. This Court previously granted an award in a claim wherein the claimant’s vehicle was damaged by concrete which fell from a bridge owned and maintained by the respondent. See Lynch v. Dept. of Highways, 13 Ct.Cl. 187 (1980). In the instant claim, the Court is of the opinion that the respondent has not met its duty of care required in the maintenance of the bridge over 1-77. Respondent had constructive, if not actual, notice of the deteriorated bridge deck. For this reason the Court has determined that respondent was negligent.
The Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $106.00 to the claimant for the damages to her automobile.
Award of $106.00.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.