Hill v. Division of Highways
Opinion of the Court
Claimant, Larry R. Hill, seeks an award of $ 1,849.62 from respondent. Division of Highways, for property damage sustained while driving his vehicle on March 12, 1994 or Route
The respondent did not present any evidence in this claim and the Court must determine the negligence of the respondent, if any, based upon the record before the Court. Claimant did not establish any notice to respondent as to the unstable condition of the berm. In fact, claimant did not realize the instability of the berm until he drove onto it. However, respondent was aware that this is a one-lane road and that vehicles traversing the road would necessarily have to traverse the berm in order to pass each other on this road. Thus, respondent had an obligation to maintain the berm properly to protect the traveling public using the road and the berm. The Court has determined that respondent was negligent in failing to warn the traveling of the unstable berm and/or to maintain the berm in stable condition.
Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimant in the amount of $1,724.62 for the damages to his automobile.
Award of $1,724.62.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.