Salmons v. Division of Highways
Opinion of the Court
The claimants, Michael Salmon and Helen Ann Salmons, seek an award of $399.95 from
Herbert C. Boggs, an area maintenance supervisor for the respondent, testified that his responsibilities include road maintenance where the collision occurred. According to Mr. Boggs, he was unaware of any obstacles or complaints concerning obstacles in the road at the time and place of the accident.
This Court has consistently followed the principle that the respondent is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists traveling on its highways. The mere existence of a foreign object on a roadway without any evidence to establish the respondent was on notice of the obstruction is insufficient to establish liability on behalf of the respondent. The evidence in this claim indicated that the respondent was unaware of this particular obstruction. Therefore, the claimant has not established negligence on the part of the respondent. Accordingly, it is the opinion of the Court that this claim must be denied.
Claim disallowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.