Division of Highways v. Division of Corrections
Opinion of the Court
This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.
In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity and- amount of the claim, but states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which to pay for the paving project. . •- :
While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision based in Airkem Sales and Services, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).
Claim disallowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.