West Virginia Court of Claims, 2010

Rogers v. Division of Highways

Rogers v. Division of Highways
West Virginia Court of Claims · Decided July 9, 2010
28 Ct. Cl. 119

Counsel

Claimant appeared pro se., C. Brian Matko, Attorney at Law, for Respondent.

Rogers v. Division of Highways

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by Claimant and Respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. At approximately 3:00 p.m. on August 9,2009, Claimant’s 2003 Harley Davidson motorcycle struck a hole on U.S. Route 119 between Elkview and Clendenin. 2. Respondent is responsible for the maintenance of U.S. Route 119 which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result, Claimant’s vehicle sustained damage to its tire and wheel in the amount of $1,196.42. Claimant’s insurance deductible was $500.00.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of $500.00 for the damages put forth by the Claimant is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that Respondent was negligent in its maintenance of U.S. Route 119 on the date of this incident; that the negligence of Respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to Claimant’s vehicle; and that the amount of damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, Claimant may make a recovery for his loss.

It is the opinion of the Court of Claims that the Claimant should be awarded the sum of $500.00 on this claim.

Award of $500.00.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.