FOR ITNH TEH SEO UUNTHITEERDN S DTIASTTERSIC DTI SOTFR WICETS CTO VUIRRGTI NIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

IN RE: ETHICON, INC. PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL 2327

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-09463

ORDER

Pending is a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Timely Effect Service of Process, filed by defendants Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson1 on February 23, 2016 (“Motion”). [ECF No. 4]. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. Background This case resides in one of seven MDLs assigned to me by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation concerning the use of transvaginal surgical mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. In the seven MDLs, there are approximately 28,000 cases currently pending, over 17,000 of which are in the Ethicon, Inc. MDL, MDL 2327. Managing the MDLs requires the court to streamline certain litigation procedures in order to improve efficiency for the parties and the court. Some of these management techniques simplify the parties’ responsibilities.

1 As used herein, Ethicon, Inc. and Johnsons & Johnson includes any of these entities former or present parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliated companies, directors, officers, design surgeons, For instance, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to serve the defendant a summons and a copy of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1). However, in this MDL, the defendants agreed to waive formal service of process as long as the plaintiff sends by email or certified mail “the short form complaint and, if in their possession, a sticker page or other medical record identifying the product(s) at issue in the case.” Pretrial Order #20, , No. 2:12-md-

2327, http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/MDL/ethicon/pdfs/PTO_20.pdf. Thus, the court excused the plaintiffs from formally serving process on the defendants here, if they completed this simple procedure. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs in this case failed to effectuate service by either method within the time allotted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).2 II. Analysis

The defendants move to dismiss this case for insufficient service of process under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5). Rule 4(m), which governs the sufficiency of service of process, provides: If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Here, the plaintiffs filed their complaint with the court on December 20, 2012

2 Any reference to rule 4(m) is to the 1993 version in effect at the time the plaintiffs filed the complaint with this court. (Complaint [ECF No. 1]). Therefore, the plaintiffs were required to either serve the defendants under Rule 4 or comply with Pretrial Order # 20 by or about April 19, 2013, but never effectuated service by either method. (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss [ECF No. 4]). In the instant Motion, the defendants are seeking their dismissal from this case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and 4(m). The deadline to file a Response to the Motion has passed and, as of the date of this order, the plaintiffs

have still not filed a Response. As a result, the court ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Timely Effect Service of Process, filed by defendants Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, is GRANTED. ,

, at *10 n.5 (S.D.W. Va. 2012) (referencing authority for the proposition that federal courts may grant a motion to dismiss without reaching the merits on grounds that the plaintiff's failure to respond operates as a concession to that motion, or that

dismissal is appropriate as a sanction for failure to prosecute) (citing

, 1294–1295 (D.C. Cir. 2004);

(1st Cir. 2004);

, 30 (3d Cir. 1991)). Because there remains other defendants in this case that did not join the motion to dismiss, the court ORDERS that only Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon LLC, and Johnson & Johnson be DISMISSED from this case without prejudice. In

addition, because Boston Scientific Corporation remains in this case as a named defendant, the court ORDERS that this civil action be TRANSFERRED to MDL 2326 The Clerk is DIRECTED to disassociate this civil action as a member case in MDL 2327 and re-associate it with MDL 2326. The court further DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: December 8, 2017

JOSEP . GOODW pe STATES om JUDGE