IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

BECKLEY DIVISION

RICHARD VILLANUEVA,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-07412

JOE COAKLEY, Warden, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On June 8, 2015, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint (Document 1) in this matter, claiming entitlement to relief pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. By Standing Order (Document 2) entered on June 8, 2015, this action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to

. Subsequently, by Order (Document 4) entered on January 6, 2016, the case was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition. On May 7, 2018, Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 5) wherein it is recommended that the Plaintiff’s Complaint 1 (Document 1) be dismissed, and that this matter be removed from the Court’s docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by May 24, 2018." Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party’s right to appeal this Court’s Order.

(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour,

(4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce,

(4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff?s Complaint (Document 1) be DISMISSED, and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court’s docket. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: May 31, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

'The docket reflects that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation mailed to the Petitioner was returned as undeliverable on May 16, 2018.