West v. United States of America

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

West v. United States of America

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

BECKLEY DIVISION

JASON HAYNES WEST,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-04241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On October 30, 2017, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint (Document 1) in this matter. The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 17) was filed on February 8, 2018. By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on October 31, 2017, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

. On June 13, 2018, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 32) wherein it is recommended that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 17) be granted, and that this matter be removed from the Court’s docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by July 2, 2018. 1 Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party’s right to appeal this Court’s Order.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour,

889 F.2d 1363, 1366

(4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce,

727 F.2d 91, 94

(4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 17) be GRANTED, and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court’s docket. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: July 11, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Reference

Status
Unknown