Lowe v. McDowell Federal Correctional Institute
Lowe v. McDowell Federal Correctional Institute
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
JERRY KAY LOWE,JR.,
Plaintiff,
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-01207
MCDOWELL FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on January 24, 2019, in which he recommended that the district court deny plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fees and Costs (ECF No. 4), dismiss plaintiff’s Complaint and Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 1 and 7) alleging violations of his constitutional and civil rights under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388,
91 S. Ct. 1999,
24 L.Ed.2d 619(1971) without prejudice, deny as moot plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 10), and remove this matter from the court’s docket. In accordance with the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn’s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour,
889 F.2d 1363(4th Cir. 1989). The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation within the seventeen-day period. Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, the court adopts the findings and recommendations contained therein. Accordingly, the court hereby DENIES plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fees and Costs (ECF No. 4), DISMISSES plaintiff’s Complaint and Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 1 and 7) without prejudice, DENIES as moot plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 10), and removes this matter from the court’s docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff pro se and counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of March, 2019. ENTER: Raut O Dabo David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown