Hawkins v. Young
Hawkins v. Young
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BECKLEY DIVISION
MALIK SHABAZZ HAWKINS,
Petitioner,
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-02024
D. L. YOUNG, Warden,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On March 27, 2017, the Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed his Application Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody (Document 1). By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on March 28, 2017, the matter was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 6) wherein it is recommended that this Court dismiss the Petitioner’s Application Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody and remove this matter from the Court’s docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by October 7, 2019. Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the 1 factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 150(1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner’s right to appeal this Court’s Order.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour,
889 F.2d 1363, 1366(4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce,
727 F.2d 91, 94(4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Petitioner’s Application Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody (Document 1) be DISMISSED and this matter be REMOVED from the Court’s docket. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: October 16, 2019 Dire. Benger’ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Reference
- Status
- Unknown