Mayo v. WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Mayo v. WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

AT BECKLEY

JEREMY MAYO, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00170 WV DIVISIONS OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER Pending is the issue of whether Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this civil action. This action was previously referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation (“PF&R”). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn filed his PF&R on March 13, 2020. Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn recommended that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice. The Court need not review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140

(1985); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (emphasis added) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner’s right to appeal the Court’s order. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also United States v. De Leon-Ramirez,

925 F.3d 177, 181

(4th Cir. 2019) (parties may not typically “appeal a magistrate judge’s findings that were not objected to below, as § 636(b) doesn’t require de novo review absent objection.”); Snyder v. Ridenour,

889 F.2d 1363, 1366

(4th Cir. 1989). Further, the Court need not conduct de novo review when a party “makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate’s proposed findings and recommendations.” Orpiano v. Johnson,

687 F.2d 44, 47

(4th Cir. 1982). Objections in this case were due on May 29, 2020. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R [Doc. 6], DISMISSES the Complaint [Doc. 2] and DISMISSES the matter. The Court directs the Clerk to transmit a copy of this Order to any counsel of record and any unrepresented party herein. ENTERED: July 28, 2020 Zul Yet ear tlh

Reference

Status
Unknown