Brandon v. Reherman
Brandon v. Reherman
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
SHANNA BRANDON,
Plaintiff,
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-00554
WARDEN REHERMAN,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendation regarding disposition pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on September 24, 2020, in which he recommended that the court grant plaintiff’s “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal,” dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice, and remove this matter from the court’s docket. (ECF No. 6.) In accordance with the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days and three mailing days in which to file objections to the PF&R. The failure of any party to file such objections within the time allowed constitutes a waiver of such party’s right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour,
889 F.2d 1363(4th Cir. 1989). The parties failed to file objections to the PF&R within the required time period. Accordingly, the court adopts the PF&R as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. The Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is further directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2021. BNTER: Raut O Dabo David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown