Murray v. Saul
Murray v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD SEAN MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-00342 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of findings and recommendation regarding disposition pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Eifert submitted to the court her Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on March 10, 2021, in which she recommended that the court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1, and remove this case from the court’s docket. In accordance with the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days and three mailing days in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Eifert's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections within the time allowed constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour,
889 F.2d 1363(4th Cir. 1989). Neither party filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations within the required time period. Accordingly, the court adopts the Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge BKifert as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1; and 2, The Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court’s docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and unrepresented parties. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd of June, 2021. ENTER: Rauil A Dads David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown