Benson v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Benson v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD

RAY BENSON,

Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-00411 Kilolo Kijakazi,1 Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on March 18, 2021, in which he recommended that the court deny plaintiff’s request for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 19), grant defendant’s request to affirm the decision (ECF No. 22), affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this matter from the Court’s docket. (ECF No. 23.)

1 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Kijakazi was substituted for Andrew Saul as the defendant in this action. In accordance with the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days and three mailing days in which to file objections to the PF&R. The failure of any

party to file such objections within the time allowed constitutes a waiver of such party’s right to a de novo review by this court. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149-50

(1985); Snyder v. Ridenour,

889 F.2d 1363, 1365-66

(4th Cir. 1989); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” (emphasis added)). Neither party filed objections to the PF&R within the required time period. Accordingly, the court adopts the PF&R as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s request for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 19) is DENIED; 2. Defendant’s request to affirm the decision below (ECF

No. 22) is GRANTED; 3. Defendant’s final decision is AFFIRMED; and 4. The case is DISMISSED from the court’s docket. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of November, 2021. ENTER:

David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown