Keaton v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Keaton v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD

LORI ANN KEATON,

Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-00855 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Eifert submitted to the court her Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“PF&R”) on October 29, 2021, in which she recommended that the court grant plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 15) to the extent that it requests remand of defendant’s decision; deny defendant’s request to affirm her decision (ECF No. 16); reverse and remand defendant’s decision pursuant to sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g); and dismiss this action from the docket of the court. (ECF No. 18.) In accordance with the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days and three mailing days in which to file objections to the PF&R. The failure of any party to file such objections within the time allowed constitutes a waiver of such party’s right to a de novo review

by this court. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149-50

(1985); Snyder v. Ridenour,

889 F.2d 1363, 1365-66

(4th Cir. 1989); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” (emphasis added)). Neither party filed objections to the PF&R within the required time period. Accordingly, the court adopts the PF&R as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED to the extent that it requests remand of defendant’s decision; 2. Defendant’s request to affirm her decision (ECF No.

16) is DENIED; 3. Defendant’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g); and 4. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice from the docket of the court. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2021. ENTER:

David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown