Albers v. Adams
Albers v. Adams
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling DAVID SCOTT ALBERS, Petitioner, V. CIVIL ACTION No. 5:21-CV-124 Judge Bailey WARDEN ADAMS, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge’s recommendation that respondent's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13] be granted and petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241[Doc. 1] be denied and dismissed with prejudice. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge’s report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140(1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge’s report pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce,
727 F.2d 91(4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,
467 U.S. 1208(1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge’s report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Doc. 26] is AFFIRMED, petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241[Doc. 1] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13] is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE the above-styled case from the active docket of this court. It is so ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se petitioner. DATED: February 1, 2022.
he TON BAILEY Z UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown