Hubbard v. Bean

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Hubbard v. Bean

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling

RAPHAE JAMAAL HUBBARD, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 5:22-CV-183 Judge Bailey TROOPER A. A. BEAN, West Virginia State Trooper, TROOPER L. EVANS, West Virginia State Trooper, LYDIA LEHMAN, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge’s recommendation that the case be dismissed with prejudice and the Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot, and the fee waived. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge’s report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140

(1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge’s report pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce,

727 F.2d 91

(4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,

467 U.S. 1208

(1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge’s report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 8] is ADOPTED, and plaintiff's State Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

[Doc. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT and the FEE WAIVED. This Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to STRIKE this case from the active docket of this Court. It is so ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se plaintiff. DATED: August VW 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown