IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling

ROBERT WILLIAM LOSE, JR., Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 5:22-CV-213 Judge Bailey CPS OFFICER, FELICA BACHOR, CPS Worker/DHHR Worker, CONGRESS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, DEPUTY OF CPS CHARSTEN, WV, MARION COUNTY CPS OFFICE, and MORGANTOWN WV CPS OFFICE, Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge’s recommendation that plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to

(g), and that his pending Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. After the entry of Magistrate Judge Mazzone’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), plaintiff also filed a Motion for Protection of Children and Parents [Doc. 11] and a Motion to Appoint Interpreter [Doc. 12], both on September 16, 2022. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge’s report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report.

(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge’s report pursuant to

(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce,

(4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,

(1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge’s report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 8] is ADOPTED, and plaintiff's case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT. Moreover, plaintiff's Motion for Protection of Children and Parents [Doc. 11] and a Motion to Appoint Interpreter [Doc. 12] are DENIED AS MOOT. This Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to STRIKE this case from the active docket of this Court. It is so ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se plaintiff. DATED: September 27, 2022. < / f =f hoc LaF UNITES ATES DISTRICT JUDGE