Nicholas v. Spencer State Police

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Nicholas v. Spencer State Police

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

JAMES L. NICHOLAS,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-cv-00401

SPENCER STATE POLICE, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On July 15, 2021, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 1) and his Complaint (Document 2). An Amended Complaint (Document 6) was filed on August 6, 2021. By Administrative Order (Document 4) entered on July 16, 2021, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

. On March 1, 2024, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 7) wherein it is recommended that the Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 1) be denied, that the Plaintiff’s Complaints (Documents 2 & 6) be dismissed, and that this matter be removed from the Court’s 1 docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by March 18, 20241. Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party’s right to appeal this Court’s Order.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour,

889 F.2d 1363, 1366

(4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce,

727 F.2d 91, 94

(4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 1) be DENIED, that the Plaintiff's Complaints (Documents 2 & 6) be DISMISSED, and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court’s docket. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: April 8, 2024 Dire. Benger’ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

'The docket reflects that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation mailed to the Petitioner was returned as undeliverable on March 18, 2024, and re-mailed to a different address on that date. As of April 7, 2024, no objections had been filed.

Reference

Status
Unknown