UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY

ALAN DISOMMA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-00528 WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION and DR. RASHID,

Defendants. ORDER Pending are Defendant West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 20], filed October 11, 2024, and Defendant Dr. Humayun Rashid’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 22], filed October 14, 2024. This action was previously referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation (“PF&R”). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn filed his PF&R on March 26, 2025. Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn recommended that the Court grant the motions to dismiss. The Court need not review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); see also

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” (emphasis added)). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner’s right to appeal the Court’s order. See

(b)(1); see also United States v. De Leon- Ramirez,

(4th Cir. 2019) (Parties may not typically “appeal a magistrate judge’s findings that were not objected to below, as § 636(b) doesn’t require de novo review absent objection.”); Snyder v. Ridenour,

(4th Cir. 1989). Further, the Court need not conduct de novo review when a party “makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate’s proposed findings and recommendations.” Orpiano v. Johnson,

(4th Cir. 1982). Objections in this case were due on April 14, 2025. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R [Doc. 36], GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss [Docs. 20, 22], DISMISSES the Complaint [Doc. 2], and DISMISSES the matter. The Court directs the Clerk to transmit a copy of this Order to any counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: May 27, 2025

“igre Chief United States District Judge