IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

DENISE R.,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-cv-00083

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar Aboulhosn for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition pursuant to

. On June 12, 2025, Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted his Proposed Findings & Recommendations, [ECF No. 8] (“PF&R”), and recommended that the court DENY Plaintiff’s request for remand, GRANT the Commissioner’s request to affirm the decision, AFFIRM the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISS this matter. Neither party timely filed objections to the PF&R nor sought an extension of time. A district court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1)(C). This court is not, however, required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Because the parties have not filed objections in this case, the court adopts and incorporates herein the PF&R and orders judgment consistent therewith. The court DENIES Plaintiffs request for remand, GRANTS the Commissioner’s request to affirm the decision, AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this matter from the court’s docket. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: October 2, 2025 G pe STATES DISTRICT JUDGE