Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision. The 6 that cite it most often are listed here.
- In re Big Horn River System (Wyo. 1990)
- Alexander v. United States (Wyo. 1990)
- Amos v. Lincoln County School District No. 2 (Wyo. 2015)
- Eklund v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (Wyo. 2004)
- Barker Bros., Inc. v. Barker-Taylor (Wyo. 1992)
- Stone v. Stone (Wyo. 1992)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*949 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
There having been noneompliance with Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P., in that the crossclaims of the appellant against the State of Wyoming have not been determined, therefore the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties were determined upon issuance of an order granting partial summary judgment, and there being no express determination that there is no just reason for delay. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977); Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc., Wyo., 541 P.2d 49 (1975); Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp., Wyo., 598 P.2d 812 (1979), pursuant to Rules 1.04 and 1.05 and 16, W.R.A.P., upon motion to dismiss filed by appellee, Urroz, it is
ORDERED that the entitled appeal be and is dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.