Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz

Wyoming Supreme Court
Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz, 622 P.2d 948 (Wyo. 1981)
1981 Wyo. LEXIS 324

Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz

Opinion

*949 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

There having been noneompliance with Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P., in that the crossclaims of the appellant against the State of Wyoming have not been determined, therefore the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties were determined upon issuance of an order granting partial summary judgment, and there being no express determination that there is no just reason for delay. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977); Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc., Wyo., 541 P.2d 49 (1975); Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp., Wyo., 598 P.2d 812 (1979), pursuant to Rules 1.04 and 1.05 and 16, W.R.A.P., upon motion to dismiss filed by appellee, Urroz, it is

ORDERED that the entitled appeal be and is dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
HOBACK RANCHES, INC., a Wyoming Corporation, Appellant (Defendant Below), the State of Wyoming (Defendant Below), v. Edna URROZ, Appellee (Plaintiff Below)
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published