Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Alabama Courts of Civil and Criminal Appeals /

1913

347 Alabama Court of Appeals opinions from 1913.

  • Brigman v. State 62 So. 980, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Watson v. State 62 So. 997, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Patterson v. State 62 So. 1023, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Jordan Bros. v. Gordon 62 So. 1023, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Phillips-Neely Mercantile Co. v. Banks 63 So. 31, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Bell v. Birmingham 62 So. 971, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Lanford & Co. Live Stock Corp. v. Mathis 62 So. 967, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Rigell v. State 62 So. 977, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Boyett v. State 62 So. 984, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Newell v. State 62 So. 968, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • McGilvery v. State 62 So. 982, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Abercrombie v. State 62 So. 966, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Boatner v. State 63 So. 33, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • City of Talladega v. Sims 62 So. 958, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Conville 62 So. 973, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Stephens & Donaldson v. Pierson 62 So. 969, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Stevens v. State 62 So. 1038, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Descrippo v. State 62 So. 1004, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Clark v. State 62 So. 987, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Cheshire v. State 62 So. 994, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Fulton v. State 62 So. 959, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Young v. State 62 So. 1014, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Kinsaul v. State 62 So. 990, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • United States Health & Accident Ins. v. Hill 62 So. 954, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Higdon v. Warrant Warehouse Co. 63 So. 938, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Fowler v. State 63 So. 40, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Mansfield v. State 63 So. 11, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Southern Railway v. Caldwell-Spence Co. 62 So. 975, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Gallahar v. Ingram & Co. 62 So. 989, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Northern Alabama Railway Co. v. Wilson Mercantile Co. 63 So. 34, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Bynum v. State 62 So. 983, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Hawkins v. State 62 So. 974, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Harper v. State 63 So. 23, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Tarpey v. State 63 So. 17, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Pritchett v. Fife 62 So. 1001, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Penick 62 So. 965, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Decker v. Decker 63 So. 24, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • First Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. Hite 62 So. 1018, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Moon v. Butler & Co. 62 So. 1019, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Morgan v. State 63 So. 21, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Hardin v. State 63 So. 18, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Wallace v. State 62 So. 365, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Wright v. State 63 So. 14, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Bailey v. Gaston 62 So. 1017, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • McAdams & Co. v. Smith 62 So. 1000, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Coursen 62 So. 977, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Hudgins v. Pickens County 62 So. 995, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Barney Coal Co. v. Davis 62 So. 985, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Bowen v. State 9 Ala. App. 664, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Dunn v. State 62 So. 996, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑