Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Supreme Court of Alabama /

1909

669 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.

  • Meyers v. Martinez 50 So. 351, (Ala. 1909)
  • City of Woodlawn v. Durham 50 So. 356, (Ala. 1909)
  • State v. Capitol Brewing & Ice Co. 50 So. 312, (Ala. 1909)
  • Central Foundry Co. v. Bailey 50 So. 346, (Ala. 1909)
  • Western Union Tel. Co. v. Jackson 50 So. 315, (Ala. 1909)
  • Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Williams 50 So. 328, (Ala. 1909)
  • Sullivan Timber Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. 50 So. 941, (Ala. 1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Britton 50 So. 350, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Smith 50 So. 390, (Ala. 1909)
  • Higdon v. Garrett 50 So. 323, (Ala. 1909)
  • Gandy v. Cowart 50 So. 355, (Ala. 1909)
  • Brown v. Floyd 50 So. 995, (Ala. 1909)
  • Haynes Mercantile Co. v. Bell 50 So. 311, (Ala. 1909)
  • Scheuerman v. Scharfenbergh 50 So. 335, (Ala. 1909)
  • Michael v. State ex rel. Welch 50 So. 929, (Ala. 1909)
  • Duke v. Southern Hardware & Supply Co. 50 So. 892, (Ala. 1909)
  • Irvin v. Strother 50 So. 969, (Ala. 1909)
  • Bank of Waynesboro v. Healing Springs Merc. Co. 50 So. 882, (Ala. 1909)
  • Allen v. Bromberg 50 So. 884, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. Girod 51 So. 242, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. Williamson 51 So. 144, (Ala. 1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Ratliffe 51 So. 335, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hamrick v. Gilbreath 51 So. 336, (Ala. 1909)
  • Dailey v. Koepple 51 So. 348, (Ala. 1909)
  • Albes v. Southern Ry. Co. 51 So. 327, (Ala. 1909)
  • Craney v. White 51 So. 236, (Ala. 1909)
  • Terrell v. Southern Railway Co. 51 So. 254, (Ala. 1909)
  • Wheeler v. Armstrong 51 So. 268, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Water Works Co. v. Ferguson 51 So. 150, (Ala. 1909)
  • Goldstein v. Lathrop-Hatten Lumber Co. 51 So. 150, (Ala. 1909)
  • Rittenberry v. Smyer 51 So. 233, (Ala. 1909)
  • Ex parte State ex rel. City of Birmingham 51 So. 309, (Ala. 1909)
  • Gelders v. State ex rel. Freeman 51 So. 232, (Ala. 1909)
  • Eidge v. City of Bessemer 51 So. 246, (Ala. 1909)
  • Parker v. State 51 So. 260, (Ala. 1909)
  • Howard v. State 50 So. 954, (Ala. 1909)
  • Griffin v. State 50 So. 962, (Ala. 1909)
  • Barnett v. State 51 So. 299, (Ala. 1909)
  • Streety v. State 51 So. 415, (Ala. 1909)
  • Smith v. Town of New Decatur 51 So. 984, (Ala. 1909)
  • Grasselli Chemical Co. v. Davis 52 So. 35, (Ala. 1909)
  • Sloss Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Mitchell 52 So. 69, (Ala. 1909)
  • Williams v. State 50 So. 59, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hill v. State 40 So. 41, (Ala. 1909)
  • Vernon v. State 50 So. 57, (Ala. 1909)
  • Smith v. State 49 So. 1029, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co. v. Parker 50 So. 55, (Ala. 1909)
  • Stevenson & Herzfeld v. Whatley 40 So. 41, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tennessee C. I. &. R. R. v. King 40 So. 75, (Ala. 1909)
  • Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Sharpe 50 So. 52, (Ala. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑