1909
740 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.
- Langley v. Pulliam 50 So. 365, (Ala. 1909)
- McCullars v. Reaves 50 So. 313, (Ala. 1909)
- Taylor v. Taylor 40 So. 375, (Ala. 1909)
- State ex rel. Norwood v. Goldsmith 50 So. 394, (Ala. 1909)
- State ex rel. Garber v. Semmes 50 So. 351, (Ala. 1909)
- State v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. 50 So. 366, (Ala. 1909)
- Gray v. South & North Ala. R. R. 50 So. 352, (Ala. 1909)
- Jones v. Jones 50 So. 310, (Ala. 1909)
- Bromberg v. Eugenotto Construction Co. 50 So. 314, (Ala. 1909)
- Harris v. Basden 50 So. 321, (Ala. 1909)
- Childress v. Smith-Echols-Burnett Hdw. Co. 50 So. 322, (Ala. 1909)
- Tippett v. Gandy 50 So. 331, (Ala. 1909)
- Carolina-Portland Cement Co. v. Alabama Construction Co. 50 So. 332, (Ala. 1909)
- Alabama Western Railroad v. Talley-Bates Const. Co. 50 So. 341, (Ala. 1909)
- Batson v. Johnson 50 So. 348, (Ala. 1909)
- J. E. Hough & Sons v. Styles 50 So. 349, (Ala. 1909)
- Roll v. Puritan Manufacturing Co. 50 So. 354, (Ala. 1909)
- Montgomery Iron Works Co. v. Capital City Ins. 50 So. 358, (Ala. 1909)
- Andrews v. Burton 50 So. 359, (Ala. 1909)
- Davis v. Simpson Coal Co. 50 So. 368, (Ala. 1909)
- Patterson v. Grand Lodge K. of P. 50 So. 377, (Ala. 1909)
- Smith v. Sharpe 50 So. 381, (Ala. 1909)
- Lord v. Calhoun 50 So. 402, (Ala. 1909)
- Houston County v. Henry County 50 So. 311, (Ala. 1909)
- Hagood v. Smith 50 So. 374, (Ala. 1909)
- Harrison v. Rodgers 50 So. 364, (Ala. 1909)
- Bentley v. Barnes 50 So. 361, (Ala. 1909)
- Duy v. Higdon 50 So. 378, (Ala. 1909)
- Jones v. Southern Ry. Co. 50 So. 380, (Ala. 1909)
- Meyers v. Martinez 50 So. 351, (Ala. 1909)
- City of Woodlawn v. Durham 50 So. 356, (Ala. 1909)
- State v. Capitol Brewing & Ice Co. 50 So. 312, (Ala. 1909)
- Central Foundry Co. v. Bailey 50 So. 346, (Ala. 1909)
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. Jackson 50 So. 315, (Ala. 1909)
- Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Williams 50 So. 328, (Ala. 1909)
- Sullivan Timber Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. 50 So. 941, (Ala. 1909)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Britton 50 So. 350, (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Railway Co. v. Smith 50 So. 390, (Ala. 1909)
- Higdon v. Garrett 50 So. 323, (Ala. 1909)
- Gandy v. Cowart 50 So. 355, (Ala. 1909)
- Brown v. Floyd 50 So. 995, (Ala. 1909)
- Carmichael v. United States F. & G. Co. 50 So. 1003, (Ala. 1909)
- Haynes Mercantile Co. v. Bell 50 So. 311, (Ala. 1909)
- Scheuerman v. Scharfenbergh 50 So. 335, (Ala. 1909)
- Michael v. State ex rel. Welch 50 So. 929, (Ala. 1909)
- Duke v. Southern Hardware & Supply Co. 50 So. 892, (Ala. 1909)
- Irvin v. Strother 50 So. 969, (Ala. 1909)
- Bank of Waynesboro v. Healing Springs Merc. Co. 50 So. 882, (Ala. 1909)
- Allen v. Bromberg 50 So. 884, (Ala. 1909)
- Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. Girod 51 So. 242, (Ala. 1909)