Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1909

362 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1909.

  • Cahlan v. Bank of Lassen County 105 P. 765, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • In re Lewis 105 P. 774, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Parmelee v. Dixon 105 P. 1116, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • President & Board of Trustees of California College v. Stephens 105 P. 614, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Green v. Gavin 105 P. 761, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Victor Power and Mining Co. v. Alvares 105 P. 761, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Victor Power and Mining Co. v. Zerr 105 P. 761, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • In re San Chung 105 P. 609, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Victor Power and Mining Co. v. Cole 105 P. 758, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Victor Power & Mining Co. v. Zerr 11 Cal. App. 503, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Victor Power & Mining Co. v. Alvares 11 Cal. App. 505, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Leffingwell 105 P. 427, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Bellafont 105 P. 426, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Canty v. Brown 105 P. 428, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Lewis v. Superior Court 105 P. 763, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Matezuski 105 P. 425, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Disperati 105 P. 617, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Russell v. Banks 105 P. 261, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. McKeehan 105 P. 273, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • John Brickell Co. v. Sutro 105 P. 948, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Baird v. Justice's Court of Riverside Township 105 P. 259, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Soto 105 P. 420, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Singh 105 P. 423, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Treis v. Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Co. 105 P. 275, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Knott v. Patnott 105 P. 260, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Elsom v. Moore 105 P. 271, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pacific Paving Co. v. Verso 105 P. 136, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Frese v. Mutual Life Insurance of New York 105 P. 265, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Reclamation District No. 70 v. Sherman 105 P. 277, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Bartlett Estate Co. v. Fraser 105 P. 130, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Peterson v. Nesbitt 105 P. 135, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Beall v. Weir 105 P. 133, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Union Ice Co. v. Rose 104 P. 1006, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Paine v. Ward 105 P. 132, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Sherman v. Gray 104 P. 1004, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Ahlers v. Smiley 104 P. 997, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Knoblock 104 P. 1012, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Samuels v. Larrimore 104 P. 1001, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Curtin v. Ingle 104 P. 1003, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Wright & Kimbrough v. Carly 104 P. 1009, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Spangler v. Spangler 104 P. 995, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • San Francisco Teaming Co. v. Gray 104 P. 999, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Blodgett v. Scott 104 P. 842, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • La Dow v. National BuildIng & Paying Brick Co. 104 P. 838, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Willow Land Co. v. Goldschmidt 104 P. 841, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rosenow v. Wiener 104 P. 839, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Tibbals Oakum Co. v. Meigs 104 P. 844, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • City of Los Angeles v. Lelande 104 P. 717, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Bradley v. Bush 104 P. 845, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co. 104 P. 713, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑