Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1909

314 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1909.

  • In Re Junqua 103 P. 159, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hooper v. Young 102 P. 950, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Skinner v. Knickrehm 102 P. 947, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Curtin v. Dunne 102 P. 825, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Harris v. the Munro Co. 102 P. 821, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Katz 102 P. 946, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Kauffman, Davinson & Co. v. W. F. Shaw & Co. 102 P. 671, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Older v. Superior Court 102 P. 829, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hooe v. O'Callaghan 103 P. 175, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cox v. Hughes 102 P. 956, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Silva v. Hawn 102 P. 952, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • H. P. Smith Co. v. Suttich 102 P. 683, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Damon v. McDougald 102 P. 684, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Turpin 102 P. 680, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye 102 P. 677, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Courtright 102 P. 542, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • McDonald v. Hoffman 102 P. 673, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Ward 102 P. 679, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • In Re Avdalas 102 P. 674, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Winchester v. Payne 102 P. 531, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Boye v. Andrews 102 P. 551, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hubbard v. Lee 102 P. 528, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Lemon v. Hubbard 102 P. 554, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cary v. Blodgett 102 P. 668, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Heacock 102 P. 543, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Clavo v. Clavo 102 P. 556, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • In Re Driggs 102 P. 542, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Holdt v. Hazard 102 P. 540, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Long v. Newman 102 P. 534, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Superior Court 102 P. 547, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • San Domingo Gold Mining Co. v. Grand Pacific Gold Mining Co. 102 P. 548, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Berkeley Development Co. v. Marx 102 P. 278, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Oliver v. Burnett 102 P. 223, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Heitman v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 102 P. 15, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Buhrmeister v. Buhrmeister 102 P. 221, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Migliavacca v. City of Napa 102 P. 227, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • City of Los Angeles v. Gager 102 P. 17, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Lintott v. San Francisco Construction Co. 101 P. 1064, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Dane v. Layne 101 P. 1067, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Wegerer v. Jordan 101 P. 1066, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Holt v. James 101 P. 1065, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Ex Parte McKenney 101 P. 927, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Berger v. Horlock 101 P. 918, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Sievers v. Root 101 P. 925, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Green v. Gavin 101 P. 931, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • WM. Knapp & Co. v. San Joaquin Cigar Co. 101 P. 929, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Ruppel v. United Railroads 101 P. 803, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Kiger v. the McCarthy Co. 101 P. 928, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Carlson v. Carlson 101 P. 923, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Varni v. Devoto 101 P. 934, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑