1909
363 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1909.
- People v. Ward 102 P. 679, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- In re Avdalas 102 P. 674, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Winchester v. Payne 102 P. 531, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Boye v. Andrews 102 P. 551, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Hubbard v. Lee 102 P. 528, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ryan v. Oakland Gas Light & Heat Co. 102 P. 558, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Lemon v. Hubbard 102 P. 554, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Cary v. Blodgett 102 P. 668, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- People v. Weir 102 P. 539, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- People v. Heacock 102 P. 543, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Clavo v. Clavo 102 P. 556, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- In re Driggs 102 P. 542, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Houghton Co. v. Kennnedy 102 P. 533, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Holdt v. Hazard 102 P. 540, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Long v. Newman 102 P. 534, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Superior Court 102 P. 547, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- San Domingo Gold Mining Co. v. Grand Pacific Gold Mining Co. 102 P. 548, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Berkeley Development Co. v. Marx 102 P. 278, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Oliver v. Burnett 102 P. 223, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Heitman v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 102 P. 15, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Bell v. Camm 102 P. 225, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Buhrmeister v. Buhrmeister 102 P. 221, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- In re Thomas 102 P. 19, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Migliavacca v. City of Napa 102 P. 227, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- City of Los Angeles v. Gager 102 P. 17, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Lintott v. San Francisco Construction Co. 101 P. 1064, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Dane v. Layne 101 P. 1067, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Wegerer v. Jordan 101 P. 1066, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Holt v. James 101 P. 1065, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ex Parte McKenney 101 P. 927, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Berger v. Horlock 101 P. 918, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Crowley Launch & Tugboat Co. v. Suprior Court 101 P. 935, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Sievers v. Root 101 P. 925, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Lane v. Storke 101 P. 937, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Green v. Gavin 101 P. 931, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- WM. Knapp & Co. v. San Joaquin Cigar Co. 101 P. 929, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ruppel v. United Railroads 101 P. 803, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Kiger v. the McCarthy Co. 101 P. 928, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Killian v. Killian 101 P. 806, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Carlson v. Carlson 101 P. 923, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Varni v. Devoto 101 P. 934, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Pitcairn v. Harkness 101 P. 809, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- White v. Spreckels 101 P. 920, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Jones v. Leonardt 101 P. 811, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ex Parte King 101 P. 810, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co. 101 P. 914, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Wetherbee v. Johnston 101 P. 802, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Viera v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. 101 P. 690, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- People v. Casselman 101 P. 693, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Meeker v. Simmons 101 P. 683, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)