Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1909

314 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1909.

  • Pitcairn v. Harkness 101 P. 809, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • White v. Spreckels 101 P. 920, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Jones v. Leonardt 101 P. 811, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Ex Parte King 101 P. 810, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co. 101 P. 914, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Wetherbee v. Johnston 101 P. 802, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Viera v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. 101 P. 690, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Meeker v. Simmons 101 P. 683, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Otis Elevator Co. v. Brainerd 101 P. 691, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pearson v. M. M. Potter Co. 101 P. 681, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • McCormick-Ormand Co. v. Nofziger Brothers Lumber Co. 101 P. 688, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rooker v. Samuels 101 P. 689, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Burke v. Maze 101 P. 438, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Gonella v. Simmons 101 P. 685, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Glowner v. De Alvarez 101 P. 432, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Stockton Lumber Co. v. California Navigation & Improvement Co. 101 P. 541, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Blanchard v. Blanchard 101 P. 536, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Charters v. Stansbury 101 P. 418, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • United Investment Co. v. Los Angeles Interurban Railway Co. 101 P. 543, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • California Domestic Water Co. v. County of Los Angeles 101 P. 547, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Olivas 101 P. 434, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Wehner v. Bauer 101 P. 417, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Ots v. Superior Court 101 P. 431, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Magee v. Superior Court 101 P. 532, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • McPhee v. Corrigan 101 P. 530, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cummings v. Roeth 101 P. 434, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • In Re McCoy 101 P. 419, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Prefumo v. Russell 101 P. 24, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Nilson v. Oakland Traction Co. 101 P. 413, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hobbs v. Hobbs 101 P. 22, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Woods v. Bank of Haywards 106 P. 730, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Del Vecchio v. Savelli 101 P. 32, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Dollar v. International Banking Corp. 101 P. 34, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • D. I. Nofziger Lumber Co. v. Waters 101 P. 38, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • McDonnell v. McDonnell 101 P. 40, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Merchants' Trust Co. v. Bentel 101 P. 31, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Waechter v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. 101 P. 41, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Casey v. Richards 101 P. 36, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Baumgarten v. Mitchell 101 P. 43, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Baldocchi 101 P. 28, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Dunn v. Richard & John Stegemann 101 P. 25, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pashgian v. Stephenson 100 P. 1075, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hickman-Coleman Co. v. Leggett 100 P. 1072, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cowell v. Linforth 100 P. 1071, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • California Casket Co. v. McGinn 100 P. 1077, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • O'Donnell v. Murphy 100 P. 1071, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Farmer v. Behmer 100 P. 901, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • People v. Laverty 100 P. 899, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Utah-Nevada Co. v. De Lamar 100 P. 884, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
  • In Re Estate Long 100 P. 892, (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑