Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1921

762 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1921.

  • Rodabaugh v. Kauffman 200 P. 747, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Koenigstein v. Koenigstein 200 P. 730, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. Brown 200 P. 727, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. Martin 200 P. 808, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Oldershaw v. Kingsbaker Bros. Co. 200 P. 729, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Arakelian v. Sears 200 P. 757, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Orly v. Russell 200 P. 732, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Mazuran v. Finn 200 P. 769, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Nelson v. Hoge 200 P. 734, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Kinney v. Jos. Herspring & Co. 200 P. 737, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ross v. Witter 200 P. 747, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ross v. Tabor 200 P. 971, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ross v. Kalin 200 P. 745, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Shank v. Blackburn 200 P. 762, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. 200 P. 805, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ross v. Witter 53 Cal. App. 801, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Cordts v. Superior County 200 P. 726, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • In re Sackett 200 P. 742, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Fuller Co. v. Chatham 200 P. 293, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Reynolds v. Morse 53 Cal. App. 592, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Chatham 53 Cal. App. 800, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Braselton v. Vokal 200 P. 670, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Proper v. Sutter Drainage District 200 P. 664, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Marks v. Jos. H. Rucker & Co. 200 P. 655, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Russell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co. 200 P. 668, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Bank of South San Francisco v. Pike 200 P. 754, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District 200 P. 814, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ford v. Industrial Accident Commission 200 P. 667, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • San Ramon Valley Bank v. Walden Co. 200 P. 662, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Guaranty Loan Co. v. Treadwell 200 P. 653, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Bank of South San Francisco v. Pike 200 P. 752, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Brasher v. White 200 P. 657, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • In re Spagnoli Ex Rel. Murphy 200 P. 836, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Noce v. United Railroads 200 P. 819, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Meer v. Cerati 200 P. 501, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Barnett v. Schaeffer 200 P. 508, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. Murphy 200 P. 484, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. MacDonald 200 P. 491, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • West v. Visalia Abstract Co. 200 P. 351, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • City of Los Angeles v. Shafer 200 P. 384, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Dallas v. De Yoe 200 P. 361, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Falkenberg v. Giacomazzi 200 P. 372, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Mohn v. Superior Court 200 P. 360, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Knabbe v. United Properties Co. 200 P. 369, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Snyder v. United Properties Co. 200 P. 366, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Dell v. Superior Court 200 P. 85, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Lowell v. the United Properties Co. 200 P. 369, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Sincerney v. City of Los Angeles 200 P. 380, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Egenberger v. the United Properties Co. 200 P. 370, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Lowell v. United Properties Co. 53 Cal. App. 798, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
« Prev 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 16 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑