Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1921

762 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1921.

  • Egenberger v. United Properties Co. 53 Cal. App. 799, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • City of Pasadena v. Industrial Accident Commission 200 P. 370, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Robinson v. Order of Railway Employees 200 P. 87, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Kashiki v. California Growers & Shippers, Inc. 200 P. 357, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • County of Inyo v. Hess 200 P. 373, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Maurice v. Lehnhardt 200 P. 359, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Clough v. W. H. Healy Co. 200 P. 378, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Burr v. Gardella 200 P. 493, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Jones v. Industrial Accident Commission 200 P. 50, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Wardrobe v. Miller 200 P. 77, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Wagner v. City of Inglewood 200 P. 60, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Dracovich v. Dracovich 200 P. 44, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • McAuliffe v. McAuliffe 199 P. 1071, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Burns v. Jackson 200 P. 80, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Stafford v. Hill 200 P. 33, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Brown v. Pepperdine 200 P. 36, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Spring v. McCabe 200 P. 41, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Albert v. McKay & Co. 200 P. 83, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Cornell v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 199 P. 1087, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Almquist v. Garner 200 P. 76, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Rutherford v. Peppa 199 P. 1111, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Kemp v. Van Bezel 199 P. 1099, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Price v. Smith Manufacturing Co. 200 P. 53, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Carlson v. Leonard 200 P. 40, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Butters v. City of Oakland 200 P. 354, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Berthiaume v. Groom 200 P. 43, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Shebley v. Peters 200 P. 364, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Flint v. Conner 200 P. 37, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Bowen v. Hickey 200 P. 46, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ackerman v. Channel Commercial Co. 199 P. 1101, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Lesser v. New York Life Insurance 200 P. 22, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • In re Denecke 200 P. 53, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • In re Volpi 199 P. 1090, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • In re Carlton 200 P. 51, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Benussi v. Hannah 199 P. 1063, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Houston v. Williams 200 P. 55, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Daroux v. Daroux 199 P. 1112, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. Wymer 199 P. 815, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Rudin v. Luman 199 P. 874, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Scheimer v. James 199 P. 827, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. Hinrich 199 P. 1058, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Green v. Southern Pacific Co. 199 P. 1059, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. City & County of San Francisco 199 P. 1108, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Fikes 199 P. 811, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Young v. Laguna Land & Water Co. 199 P. 810, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • People v. Suprerior Court 199 P. 840, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co. 200 P. 27, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • King v. Tarabino 199 P. 890, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Company 200 P. 32, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
  • Korkman v. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. 199 P. 880, (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
« Prev 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 16 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑