Delaware Court of Common Pleas, 1793

State v. Watt's Executors

State v. Watt's Executors
Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Decided December 15, 1793 · Bassett
1 Del. Cas. 340

Counsel

Vandyke, Johns and Levy for plaintiff. George Read, John Read and Bayard for defendant.

State v. Watt's Executors

Opinion of the Court

Bassett, C. J.

It is the duty of executors and administrators to return inventories, as it is the interest of creditors and heirs that they should be duly returned. Great inconveniences would follow if the objections to the present inventory were to prevail. Most inventories would be lost, and infants when they came of age would be without proof of their property. The practice in the Orphans’ and Register’s Courts has been very loose as to compelling the return of regular inventories in proper time. The objections to the inventory are grounded upon the delinquency of the administrator, and it would be wrong to suffer him or his security who is privy to prevail upon such ground.

McDonough and Rodney, JJ., concurring, inventory admitted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.