Delaware Court of Common Pleas, 1796

McCall's Lessee v. Denny & Lockerman

McCall's Lessee v. Denny & Lockerman
Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Decided May 15, 1796
1 Del. Cas. 397

Counsel

Bidgely and Bayard for plaintiff. Bead and Miller for defendant.

McCall's Lessee v. Denny & Lockerman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Court have no doubt as to the admissibility of the evidence. The eleventh section of the Act referred to *398by the plaintiff’s counsel must remove any doubt that could arise on the subject.

Bidgely and Bayard for plaintiff. Bead and Miller for defendant.

Survey admitted.

The counsel for the defendants prayed a bill of exceptions,, which was granted but not prosecuted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.