Delaware Orphan's Court, 1795

Kennohan v. Cooke

Kennohan v. Cooke
Delaware Orphan's Court · Decided May 15, 1795
1 Del. Cas. 486

Counsel

Miller, for the appellants,

Kennohan v. Cooke

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Let the decree of the Register be affirmed.

(They did not assign their reasons for affirming it.)

[Note]

The order of administration: the Act, 1 Del.Laws 284, 285, recites that “the Registers of the several counties, having power to grant administration to the widow or next of kin to the intestate and upon their refusal to the principal creditor or creditors of the intestate as he shall think meet,” etc.

By the civil law, as in England — ■

Widow or/and

And to one or both.

Scanned image of a page of this opinion. The text on this page is not available in machine-readable form.

Reasons for this decision then probably were: 1. The agreement between the widow and Robert. 2. After the death of his father, Robert was next of kin and so equally entitled with the widow. And, lastly, it is impolitic to grant administration to a wife on second marriage, who then ceases to be the intestate’s widow and throws the administration on one who is too often so situated in regard to the intestate’s affairs as to have a fair opportunity of embezzling without incurring the danger of detection.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.