1891
271 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1891.
- Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. De Baum 28 N.E. 447, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Hoffman v. Toll 28 N.E. 557, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Lauter v. Simpson 28 N.E. 324, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Payne v. Albany City National Bank 28 N.E. 432, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Taft 28 N.E. 443, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. Quinkert 28 N.E. 338, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Collier v. Cunningham 28 N.E. 341, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Haugh, Ketcham & Company Iron Works v. Duncan 28 N.E. 334, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Bash v. Young 28 N.E. 344, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Barnes 28 N.E. 328, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Gastlin v. Weeks 28 N.E. 331, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Weller v. Bectell 28 N.E. 333, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Stephenson v. Elliott 28 N.E. 326, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Thiele v. McManus 28 N.E. 327, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Alexander v. Collins 28 N.E. 190, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Graeter v. Hogan 28 N.E. 209, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Vogel v. O'Toole 28 N.E. 209, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Eichel v. Senhenn 28 N.E. 193, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Etzler 34 N.E. 669, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Crockett 28 N.E. 222, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- McFarland v. Lillard 28 N.E. 229, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Scarry v. Bennett 28 N.E. 231, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Lloyd v. Davis 28 N.E. 232, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. Hart 28 N.E. 218, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Stewart v. Pennsylvania Co. 28 N.E. 211, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Traylor v. Richardson 28 N.E. 205, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Sargent 28 N.E. 215, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Leach v. Ackerman 28 N.E. 216, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Pennsylvania Co. v. Lindley 28 N.E. 106, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Mainard v. Reider 28 N.E. 196, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Starke v. Dicks 28 N.E. 214, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Hughes 28 N.E. 158, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Wolf v. Goodwin 28 N.E. 192, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Salimonie Mining & Gas Co. v. Wagner 28 N.E. 158, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Eichel v. Bower 28 N.E. 192, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Knisely v. Hire 28 N.E. 195, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Consolidated Tank Line Co. v. Bronson 28 N.E. 155, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- McClure v. Lucas 28 N.E. 153, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Cook v. Flint 28 N.E. 200, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Landers v. Fisher 28 N.E. 204, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Town of Williamsport v. Smith 28 N.E. 156, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Bushman v. Taylor 28 N.E. 97, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Gross v. Haisley 28 N.E. 123, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Meiser v. Smith 27 N.E. 871, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Alexander v. Harrison 28 N.E. 119, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. Flinn 28 N.E. 201, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Alexandria Mining & Exploring Co. v. Painter 28 N.E. 113, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- McCormick v. McCormick 28 N.E. 122, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Goodwine v. Barnett 28 N.E. 115, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Walls v. Long 28 N.E. 101, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)