Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Court of Appeals /

1899

250 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1899.

  • Clark v. Schromeyer 55 N.E. 785, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • City of Michigan City v. Leeds 55 N.E. 799, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Muncie Pulp Co. v. Martin 55 N.E. 796, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • East Chicago Iron & Steel Co. v. Siwy 55 N.E. 785, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • United States Capsule Co. v. Isaacs 55 N.E. 832, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Roehm v. Reed 55 N.E. 772, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Hall v. State ex rel. Hayden 55 N.E. 798, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Pape v. Kaough 55 N.E. 775, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Brackett v. Brackett 55 N.E. 783, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Moore v. Winstead 55 N.E. 777, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • McDowell v. North 55 N.E. 789, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Peirce v. Chism 55 N.E. 795, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Farmers Insurance v. Burris 55 N.E. 773, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Morrow v. Geeting 55 N.E. 787, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • City of Hammond v. Evans 55 N.E. 784, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Perkins Windmill & Ax Co. v. Yeoman 55 N.E. 782, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Colborn v. Fry 55 N.E. 621, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Kenney v. Wells 55 N.E. 774, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Bradley, Holton & Co. v. Whicker 55 N.E. 490, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Scherer v. Scherer 55 N.E. 494, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Hernley v. Brannum 55 N.E. 512, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. Mikesell 55 N.E. 488, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Borman v. Jung Brewing Co. 55 N.E. 495, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • City of Bedford v. Woody 55 N.E. 499, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Week v. Widgeon 55 N.E. 487, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • West v. Graff 55 N.E. 506, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Rinehart v. State ex rel. Keith 55 N.E. 504, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • State v. Robertson 55 N.E. 491, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Shrum 55 N.E. 515, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Whitman Agricultural Co. v. Hornbrook 55 N.E. 502, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Musgrave 55 N.E. 496, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Burket v. Miller 55 N.E. 500, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Pape v. Hartwig 23 Ind. App. 333, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Miller v. Stevens 55 N.E. 262, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Davis v. O'Bryant 55 N.E. 261, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • State ex rel. Fisher v. Carey 55 N.E. 261, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Marion City Railway Co. v. Dubois 55 N.E. 266, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Consolidated Stone Co. v. Redmon 55 N.E. 454, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County v. Board of Commissioners of Tipton County 55 N.E. 453, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Ware 55 N.E. 1103, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Snowhill 55 N.E. 1103, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Covalt 55 N.E. 1103, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Hancock 55 N.E. 1103, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Clem 55 N.E. 1102, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Hancock 24 Ind. App. 701, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Clem 55 N.E. 1102, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Town of Rochester v. Bowers 55 N.E. 235, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Storrs & Harrison Co. v. Fusselman 55 N.E. 245, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Echelbarger 55 N.E. 233, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
  • Ibach v. Huntington Light & Fuel Co. 55 N.E. 249, (Ind. Ct. App. 1899)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑