Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Supreme Court /

1914

179 Indiana Supreme Court opinions from 1914.

  • Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Skeel Oct 7, 1914 No. 22,427 182 Ind. 593; 106 N.E. 365; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 172
  • Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Conrad Jul 3, 1914 No. 22,428 182 Ind. 173; 105 N.E. 897; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 112
  • State ex rel. Simpson v. Meeker Jul 2, 1914 No. 22,593 182 Ind. 240; 105 N.E. 906; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 122
  • Halstead v. Olney J. Dean & Co. Jul 1, 1914 No. 22,514 182 Ind. 446; 105 N.E. 903; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 152
  • Kendall v. State Jul 1, 1914 No. 22,608 183 Ind. 162; 105 N.E. 899; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 190
  • Herring v. Watson Jun 30, 1914 No. 22,431 182 Ind. 374; 105 N.E. 900; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 146
  • American Surety Co. v. Pangburn Jun 26, 1914 No. 22,413 182 Ind. 116; 105 N.E. 769; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 105
  • Myers v. White Jun 24, 1914 No. 22,436 182 Ind. 108; 105 N.E. 775; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 103
  • South Bend & Mishawaka Gas Co. v. Jensen Jun 24, 1914 No. 22,220 182 Ind. 557; 105 N.E. 774; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 166
  • State ex rel. Bingham v. Fred Miller Brewing Co. Jun 24, 1914 No. 21,732 182 Ind. 713; 105 N.E. 917; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 177
  • Bray v. Tardy Jun 23, 1914 No. 22,406 182 Ind. 98; 105 N.E. 772; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 101
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Howerton Jun 23, 1914 No. 22,656 182 Ind. 208; 105 N.E. 1025; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 119
  • State ex rel. Bingham v. Home Brewing Co. Jun 23, 1914 No. 21,689 182 Ind. 75; 105 N.E. 909; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 100
  • State ex rel. Evansville Independent Telephone Co. v. Stickelman Jun 23, 1914 No. 22,443 182 Ind. 102; 105 N.E. 777; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 102
  • Strong v. Knox Jun 23, 1914 No. 22,343 182 Ind. 278; 105 N.E. 776; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 130
  • Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. City of Bloomington Jun 12, 1914 No. 22,448 182 Ind. 236; 105 N.E. 561; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 121
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Schuler Jun 12, 1914 No. 22,351 182 Ind. 57; 105 N.E. 567; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 98
  • Union Trust Co. v. Curtis Jun 12, 1914 No. 22,426 182 Ind. 61; 105 N.E. 562; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 99
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Marshall Jun 9, 1914 No. 22,381 182 Ind. 280; 105 N.E. 570; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 131
  • Stieglitz v. Migatz Jun 5, 1914 No. 22,350 182 Ind. 549; 105 N.E. 465; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 164
  • Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co. Jun 4, 1914 No. 22,543 182 Ind. 36; 105 N.E. 496; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 97
  • Kaufman v. Murray Jun 4, 1914 No. 22,390 182 Ind. 372; 105 N.E. 466; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 145
  • City of Indianapolis v. Stokes Jun 2, 1914 No. 22,464 182 Ind. 31; 105 N.E. 477; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 96
  • Fisher v. Groff Jun 2, 1914 No. 22,396 182 Ind. 29; 105 N.E. 470; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 95
  • Bruns v. Cope May 26, 1914 No. 22,398 182 Ind. 289; 105 N.E. 471; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 132
  • Childress v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad May 26, 1914 No. 22,647 182 Ind. 251; 105 N.E. 467; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 124
  • Cox v. Timm May 26, 1914 No. 22,239 182 Ind. 7; 105 N.E. 479; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 92
  • Kahn v. State May 26, 1914 No. 22,439 182 Ind. 1; 105 N.E. 385; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 91
  • Hardin v. Cook May 22, 1914 No. 22,321 181 Ind. 698; 105 N.E. 231; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 88
  • Chicago, South Bend & Northern Indiana Railway Co. v. Seaman May 21, 1914 No. 22,307 182 Ind. 370; 105 N.E. 234; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 144
  • State ex rel. Sailer v. Blind May 21, 1914 No. 22,199 181 Ind. 689; 105 N.E. 225; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 87
  • State v. Patterson May 21, 1914 No. 22,578 181 Ind. 660; 105 N.E. 228; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 84
  • Horn v. Lupton May 20, 1914 No. 21,984 182 Ind. 355; 105 N.E. 237; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 143
  • Joliff v. Muncie Electric Light Co. May 20, 1914 No. 22,344 181 Ind. 650; 105 N.E. 234; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 82
  • Rose v. Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railway Co. May 20, 1914 No. 22,476 181 Ind. 658; 105 N.E. 241; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 83
  • State ex rel. Steiner v. Fiscus May 20, 1914 No. 21,864 181 Ind. 667; 105 N.E. 230; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 85
  • Higley v. Potter May 14, 1914 No. 22,385 181 Ind. 623; 105 N.E. 145; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 79
  • Jolly v. Turner May 14, 1914 No. 22,201 181 Ind. 626; 105 N.E. 145; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 80
  • Woodsmall v. State May 14, 1914 No. 22,546 181 Ind. 613; 105 N.E. 155; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 78
  • McDonald v. State ex rel. Keaton May 13, 1914 No. 22,347 181 Ind. 609; 105 N.E. 148; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 77
  • State ex rel. Stockton v. Lane May 13, 1914 No. 22,625 182 Ind. 249; 105 N.E. 147; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 123
  • Burns v. Huffman May 12, 1914 Nos. 22,154, 22,155 and 22,156 181 Ind. 591; 105 N.E. 148; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 74
  • Friebe v. Elder May 12, 1914 No. 22,640 181 Ind. 597; 105 N.E. 151; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 76
  • State ex rel. Bateman v. Hart May 12, 1914 No. 22,592 181 Ind. 592; 105 N.E. 149; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 75
  • Frost v. State ex rel. Reeves May 1, 1914 No. 22,345 181 Ind. 581; 105 N.E. 51; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 71
  • Hammond v. Toyne May 1, 1914 No. 22,626 181 Ind. 584; 105 N.E. 42; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 72
  • South Bend Home Telephone Co. v. Beaning May 1, 1914 No. 22,304 181 Ind. 586; 105 N.E. 52; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 73
  • Boos v. State Apr 30, 1914 No. 22,548 181 Ind. 562; 105 N.E. 117; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 70
  • Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Anderson Apr 30, 1914 No. 22,340 182 Ind. 140; 105 N.E. 49; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 108
  • Fink v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. Apr 30, 1914 No. 22,310 181 Ind. 539; 105 N.E. 116; 1914 Ind. LEXIS 67
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑