Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1917

512 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1917.

  • Mitchell v. Elizabeth River Lumber Co. 93 S.E. 464, (N.C. 1917)
  • Ruffin v. . Garrett 93 S.E. 449, (N.C. 1917)
  • State ex rel. Cole v. Sanders 93 S.E. 476, (N.C. 1917)
  • Commissioners of Johnston County v. Lacy 174 N.C. 141, (N.C. 1917)
  • Borden v. Carolina Power & Light Co. 93 S.E. 442, (N.C. 1917)
  • Town of Tarboro v. Walston 93 S.E. 461, (N.C. 1917)
  • Building Corporation v. . Jones 93 S.E. 440, (N.C. 1917)
  • Howell v. . Mehegan 93 S.E. 438, (N.C. 1917)
  • Godwin v. . Jernigan 93 S.E. 443, (N.C. 1917)
  • Tuthill v. Norfolk Southern Railroad 93 S.E. 446, (N.C. 1917)
  • Simmons v. . Grain Co. 94 S.E. 1054, (N.C. 1917)
  • Mizell v. Dennis Simmons Lumber Co. 93 S.E. 436, (N.C. 1917)
  • Jones-Phillips Co. v. McCormick 93 S.E. 449, (N.C. 1917)
  • Edgecombe County v. Walston 93 S.E. 460, (N.C. 1917)
  • Cohoon v. . Upton 93 S.E. 446, (N.C. 1917)
  • Creech v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad 93 S.E. 453, (N.C. 1917)
  • VanDyke v. Ætna Life Insurance 93 S.E. 444, (N.C. 1917)
  • Norfolk Building Supplies Corp. v. Jones 174 N.C. 57, (N.C. 1917)
  • Simmons v. Adams Grain & Provision Co. 174 N.C. 787, (N.C. 1917)
  • Brown v. J. S. Scofields Sons Co. 93 S.E. 381, (N.C. 1917)
  • Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners 93 S.E. 383, (N.C. 1917)
  • Rogerson v. . Hontz 93 S.E. 376, (N.C. 1917)
  • Jones v. . Brinkley 93 S.E. 372, (N.C. 1917)
  • Rucker & Sheely Co. v. Willey 93 S.E. 379, (N.C. 1917)
  • King v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad 93 S.E. 378, (N.C. 1917)
  • Fineman v. . Faulkner 93 S.E. 384, (N.C. 1917)
  • Sawyer v. . Pasquotank County 94 S.E. 369, (N.C. 1917)
  • Lake Drainage Commissioners v. Spencer 93 S.E. 378, (N.C. 1917)
  • Gray v. . Cartwright 93 S.E. 432, (N.C. 1917)
  • Graham v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. 93 S.E. 428, (N.C. 1917)
  • First National Bank of Elizabeth City v. Brockett 93 S.E. 370, (N.C. 1917)
  • Everett v. . Ballard 93 S.E. 385, (N.C. 1917)
  • Leary v. Camden Run Drainage Commissioners 93 S.E. 1053, (N.C. 1917)
  • Evans Ex Rel. Pendleton v. Dare Lumber Co. 93 S.E. 430, (N.C. 1917)
  • Potter v. . Bonner 93 S.E. 370, (N.C. 1917)
  • Bunch v. Foreman Blades Lumber Co. 93 S.E. 374, (N.C. 1917)
  • In re Municipal Annexations 227 N.C. 716, (N.C. 1917)
  • Wofford-Fain & Co. v. Hampton 92 S.E. 612, (N.C. 1917)
  • Richardson v. Board of Commissioners 92 S.E. 719, (N.C. 1917)
  • Highway Commission v. C. N. Malone & Co. 92 S.E. 719, (N.C. 1917)
  • McHan v. . Dorsey 92 S.E. 598, (N.C. 1917)
  • Reade v. . Durham 92 S.E. 712, (N.C. 1917)
  • Borden v. City of Goldsboro 92 S.E. 694, (N.C. 1917)
  • Sanatorium v. . State Treasurer 92 S.E. 689, (N.C. 1917)
  • Drewry v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co. 92 S.E. 593, (N.C. 1917)
  • Waldo v. . Wilson 92 S.E. 692, (N.C. 1917)
  • Rankin v. . Gaston County 92 S.E. 719, (N.C. 1917)
  • McGeorge v. . Nicola 92 S.E. 610, (N.C. 1917)
  • Reade v. City of Durham 173 N.C. 668, (N.C. 1917)
  • Smart v. . R. R. 92 S.E. 929, (N.C. 1917)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 11 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑